Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I was asked to ping @conda-forge/aws-sdk-cpp and so here I am doing that.

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@xhochy @conda-forge/arrow-cpp
I actually think we should try to remove the pin on aws-sdk-cpp 1.8 now, at least for arrow 10.0.0. The FATAL_ASSERT causing aws/aws-sdk-cpp#1809 was removed in aws-c-io 0.3.15, and that migration has now closed on our side.

My idea would be to rebuild arrow 10.0.0 with this, and ask for early adopters to try if the issue persists. If not, great (and we can backport to the other ABI branches), if yes, we mark the builds as broken.

PS. Obviously I don't need the migrator to do that (as there's only one dependent feedstock), but since the rest of the aws-stack has continued migrating, and aws-sdk-cpp 1.8.x isn't buildable against that anymore, we'll have to bite that bullet at some point anyway. With the FATAL_ASSERT removed, I actually have pretty high confidence that things should be fine.

@h-vetinari If you're happy to do the repodata-patches/mark-broken afterwards if it fails: Let's go for it!

Should I merge this then?

@h-vetinari If you're happy to do the repodata-patches/mark-broken afterwards if it fails: Let's go for it!

Fine by me.

Should I merge this then?

It's not so urgent, because the PR for arrow 10 is still waiting for some infra work. There's also two three migrators in the wings:

• Update pin for aws_c_sdkutils #3637
• Update pin for aws_c_http #3638
• Update pin for aws_sdk_cpp #3639

But generally I'd say we're ready (as these new versions don't seem to stop coming 😅). It only affects arrow anyway, so if we merge now then I could plonk the migrator into arrow 10.